Blog#7 Plagiarism Issues
Nowadays, universities and colleges have spent
major concerns dealing with an increasing plagiarism phenomenon occurred among
students. Since “plagiarism” has became a heated key word of university search
engine, even exceed “tuition” and “majors”, people started to reconsider the rationality
of the temporary method dealing with plagiarism. However, academic world used
to supervise plagiarism by enforcement of certain criterion, by which alert and
punish students who violated academic integrity. With the emerge of latest
technologies, website as Turnitin received its reputation by efficient
supervision and simple manipulation; which means academia kneeled to technology
and surrender to monster plagiarism. Is enforcement of plagiarism reasonable
for both professors and students, or in other word, is it fair to students who
intend to committing plagiarism and students who really want to study? In the
article “Is Policing Plagiarism At A
University As Counterproductive As Trying To Stop Copyright Infringement?”
by Mike Masnick, the author suggests
that the side effect of strangling plagiarism has overlapped its contribution
to the academic world. Mike states that
the success in supervising plagiarism by Turnitin absolutely destroyed classroom
morale in NYU, innocent students are not satisfied with the overall learning
experience because they think professor Panagiotis Ipeirotis should have spend
more energy on preparing for lecture rather than being a plagiarism detective. He
also points out that the wonder drug for avoiding plagiarism is mutual
promotion and peer supervision among students.
International students inclined
to have different reasons for plagiarism due to various cultural and academic
background. With the globalization, not only to the aspect of economics, but
also to the education, there is a climbing number of international students
study abroad. Because most of their destination are USA, UK, Australia and
Canada, in which country English language are widely used and spread, international
students should adjust and adapt to the diverse environment as soon as possible.
In the article “Cheating Across Cultures”
by Elizabeth Redden, it is reported that 34 first-year international business
school students in Duke University were accused of collaborating on a take-home
test in April, 2007, and it arouse a widely concern of motivation and reason
behind the scene. As cited by Elizabeth in his article, Greenblatt points out
that many Asian students come from education system in which the students show
respect to the professors by verbatim copying. Timothy Dodd, as cited by
Elizabeth Redden is her article, holds that language barrier has blocked the
path of international students in fully understanding codes of conduct, he also
explained that being “Exotic” in learning and living styles have alienated
international students from mainstream social groups, from which cultivate
desperation and thus, lead to cheating. Michael Elliott, director of
international student and scholar services, as cited by Elizabeth Redden in her
article, launched a program several years ago, in order to help international
students adapt to drastically different academic environment through a
brochure. Michael Elliott claimed that the brochure gave a helping hand to
international students by introducing the tip as well as sanction related to
academic issue. As cited in the article “Why
Many International Students Get a Failing Grade in Academic Integrity” by
James Bradshaw and Tamara Baluja, Karan Bellinger states that international
students do not plan on cheating, but failed to keep up with intensive academic
pace and receiving pressure from parents and job seeking lead to an unexpected
results.
No comments:
Post a Comment